End-to-end Energy Budgets in US-GLOBEC
Regions
Funded by: |
National Science Foundation (NSF) |
Principal Investigator: |
J. Steele |
Co-Principal Investigators: |
D. Gifford, J. Collie, W.O. Smith, J.J. Bisagni,
S.L. Strom, K. Coyle, D. Ainley, C, Tynan, C.
Ribic, E.E. Hofmann, K.L. Daly, J. Ruzicka, S.
Bograd, R.D. Brodeur, R. Foy, S.K. Gaichas, A.B.
Hollowed |
The proposed research addresses the
overarching question: are marine food webs leading to
fisheries controlled from the top-down, the bottom up,
or a combination of the two? To address this question we
will (1) compare end-to-end energy budgets of the 4 US-GLOBEC
study regions in the context of top-down v. bottom-up
forcing, (2) assess the skills of the regional models in
capturing basic material fluxes, (3) extract diagnostics
from the regional models that will be used to evaluate
the effects of climate change and fishing pressure
across GLOBEC regions and (4) develop quantitative
methods to compare the diagnostics. Our inability to
conduct controlled experiments is a major impediment to
the scientific study of open sea ecosystems. An
alternative is to compare studies of different
ecosystems as a proxy for manipulations of the same
system, particularly when climatic change and
over-fishing provide inadvertent perturbations at the
bottom and top of trophic webs. This approach is
especially appropriate for end-to-end analysis of marine
trophic webs with their complicated structure and
complex dynamics. Such analyses depend on the
comparability of the available data and the
compatibility of the analytical methods. Ideally, such
comparisons are based on identical methods for data
collection and analysis. The four US GLOBEC programs
provide one of the closest approximations to this ideal
situation. All four systems have been subject to large
amplitude trends or perturbations-- from climatic
changes in the Antarctic Peninsula to over-fishing on
Georges Bank. Extensive data sets are available for each
region, covering most trophic components from nutrient
input to top predators. Although there are some
similarities among the four US-GLOBEC regions, there are
striking differences in bottom depth and topography,
circulation and stratification, annual cycles and
trophic components, especially top predators. The major
successes of GLOBEC have been in elucidating the
processes underlying the dynamics of individual species
in ecosystems characterized by diverse physical
settings. The strictly “global” perspective has proved
more elusive. At the same time there is an increasing
demand for an ecosystem approach to management of marine
resources subject to fishing pressures and climatic
changes. Both of these challenges require an end-to-end
approach that can provide the framework for detailed
studies of particular species that are economically or
environmentally significant. The US-GLOBEC sites provide
sufficient diversity to test a range of methods as
prologue to the larger global challenges. This modeling
and synthesis project is a logical extension of studies
initiated under the GLOBEC program that will advance the
understanding of energy flow and trophic dynamics of
marine food webs. Analyses of the response of marine
ecosystems to climate change and their role in
biogeochemical cycles have highlighted the importance of
understanding trophic interactions. This point has been
emphasized in the synthesis phase of GLOBEC and in the
implementation phase of the Integrated Marine
Biogeochemistry and Ecosystem Research (IMBER) program.
Improving the understanding of trophic links in oceanic
food webs is integral to the ability to understand and
predict ecosystem responses to climate change and
anthropogenic forcings.
These comparisons span a range of
environments and food web structures and provide a basis
for developing a framework that allows extension to
systems not directly included in this analysis. By
identifying and analyzing similarities and differences
in marine food web structure and operation, this project
provides a basis for development of future studies of
marine food webs that have the goal of understanding
end-to-end controls on trophic production. A strong
aspect of the work is the integration of modeling and
extensive biological data sets for regions to evaluate
the biological processes, from primary producers to top
predators, controlling energy flow, trophic transfers,
carbon cycling, flux and export dynamics. The project is
a unique opportunity for graduate students (2 included
in the project) and postdoctoral investigators (2
included in the project) to become engaged in an
interdisciplinary research project that uses
quantitative and comparative analyses to understand
marine food web structure and function in a range of
ecosystems. The use of state-of-the-art modeling
approaches that are coupled to data analyses provides
opportunities to train students in a variety of
disciplines (e.g. food web modeling, data analyses, data
assimilation, marine ecology, fisheries management) that
are needed to solve many of the important problems
facing marine systems.
|